From Bion to Delany
Samuel R. Delany’s “Modular Calculus” as an Example of Bionian Transformation
Literature furnishes a particular vertex to see reality through narrative fiction. In particular, science fiction literature, which creates a fantastic situation starting from realistic data (history, science, cultures), may be considered a kind of creative process. It uses heterogeneous things and “integrates” them into a homogeneous, new and comprehensible product. Science fiction writing allows the objects of the real to be reprocessed in terms which are thinkable at the current moment. Using the terminology established in psychoanalysis by Wilfred Bion this reprocessing work is a transformation. According to Bion we can hypothesise that the writer of the science fiction literary work serves as a “container” and the science fiction novel, considered a different way to represent reality and not just a simple editorial product, serves as a alpha-function to make concepts that were not previously thinkable or understandable. Between the 70s and the 80s the writer Samuel Delany theorized and put into practice the use of a literary model called “modular calculus”. This model allows the literary work of making something unthinkable into thinkable. The purpose of this paper is to highlight how modular calculus is a particular type of Bionian transformation, and how the science fiction novel can play the role of alpha-function, transforming unthinkable concepts into thinkable ones.
Bion, W. R. (1967). Learning from experience. Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1962)
Bion, W. R. (1977). Trasformations. Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1965)
Bion, W. R. (1989). Elements of psycho-analysis. Karnac Books. (Original work published 1963)
Bion, W. R. (1990). A memoir of the future. Karnac Books. (Original work published 1975-79)
Bion, W. R. (1991). All my sins remembered: Another part of a life & the other side of genius: Family letters. Karnac Books. (Original work published 1985)
Bion, W. R. (2005). Cogitations. Karnac Books. (Original work published 1992)
Bradway, T. (2017). Queer experimental literature: The affective politics of bad reading. Palgrave Macmillan.
Broderick, D. (2005). Reading by starlight: Postmodernscience fiction. Routledge.
Delany S. (1978a). Critical methods/speculative fiction. In The jewel-hinged jaw: Notes on the language of science fiction (pp. 119-131). Berkley Windhover. (Original work published 1970-71)
Delany, S. R. (1978b). Shadow. In The jewel-hinged jaw: Notes on the language of science fiction (pp. 122-153). Berkley Windhover. (Original work published 1974-75)
Delany, S. R. (1978c). To read The dispossessed. In The jewel-hinged jaw: Notes on the language of science fiction (pp. 218-283). Berkley Windhover. (Original work published 1976)
Delany, S. R. (1985). Flight from Nevèrÿon. Bantam Books.
Delany, S. R. (1992). Triton. Grafton. (Original work published 1976)
Delany S. R. (1994). Silent interviews on language, race, sex, science fiction, and some comics. Wesleyan University Press.
Delany, S. R. (2011). The second science-fiction studies interview. Of trouble on triton and other matters. In Shorter views: Queer thoughts & the politics of the paraliterary (pp. 315-350). Wesleyan University Press. (Original work published 1990)
Delany, S. R. (2012). Starboard wine: More notes on the language of science fiction. Wesleyan University Press. (Original work published 1984)
Dick, P. K. (1995). Who is an SF writer? In The shifting realities of Philip K. Dick: Selected literary and philosophical writings (pp. 69-78). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1974)
Eco U. (1989). The open work. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1962)
Ferro, A. (2009). Mind works: Technique and creativity in psychoanalysis. Routledge. (Original work published 1999)
Feldman, C. F. (1997). Literary genres as mental models. In M. Ammaniti, D. Stern (Eds.), Rappresentazioni e narrazioni (pp. 113-131). Laterza. (Original work published 1994)
Hagmann, G. (2005). Aesthetic experience: Beauty, creativity, and the search for the ideal. Rodopi.
Harris-Williams, M. (2011). Underlying pattern in Bion’s memoir of the future. In C. Mawson (Ed.), Bion today (pp. 381-405). Routledge. (Original work published 1983)
Idema, T. (2015). Toward a minor science fiction: Literature, science, and the shock of the biophysical. Configurations, 23 (2), 35–59.
Imbasciati, A. (2001). The unconscious as symbolopoiesis. Psychoanalytic Review, 88 (6), 837-873.
Mawson C. (2011). Introduction: Bion today – thinking in the field. In C. Mawson (Ed.), Bion today (pp. 3-32). Routledge.
McHugh, D. (2003). Give me your mirrorshades: Science fiction ‘methodology’ meets the social and organizational sciences. In M. Higgins, G. Lightfoot, M. Parker, W. Smith (Eds.), Science fiction and organization (pp. 15-30). Routledge.
Miller, G. A. (2012). Exploring the limits of the human through science fiction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Monti, F. (2014). Osservare al nido. Pensieri in cerca di un Pensatore. Persiani.
Priel, B. (2013). Transformation and invariance in creative translations and analytic interpretations: A Bionian reading of Borges and Cervantes. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 94(6), 1115–1127.
Raven, P. G. (2016). The rhetorics of futurity: Scenarios, design fiction, prototypes and other evaporated modalities of science fiction. Foundation, 123, 50-63.
Resnick, M. (1994). Introduction. In M. Resnick, A. R. Lewis (Eds.) The passage of the light: The recursive science fiction of Barry N. Malzberg (p. vii-x). Nesfa Press.
Sandler, P. C. (2006). The origins of Bion’s work. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87 (1), 179–201.
Skelton, R. M. (1995). Bion’s use of modern logic. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76 (2), 389-397.
Slochower, H. (1965). Symbolism and the creative process of art. American Imago, 22 (1), 112-127.
Tucker, J. A., (2010). The necessity of models, of alternatives: Samuel R. Delany’s Stars in my Pocket like grains of sand. South Atlantic Quarterly, 109 (2), 249-278.
Waska, R. (2005). Symbolization and the good object. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 69 (1), 81-97.
This is an Open Access journal. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated.
Please read our Open Access, Copyright and Permissions policies for more information.