5 2 27-45 2016

Theory at all Points: A Methodological Quest for Psychotherapy Research

Florian Dreyer

Abstract


There is the common believe that data and theory are two distinct poles on the same scientific continuum. This notion is enriched with ideas from the fields of psychoanalysis, sociology and conversation analysis. The description of conversational reality in accordance with the knowledge of psychotherapeutic theory is exemplified through the analysis of a therapy transcript. A special spotlight is shed on the dyads’ use of the recipient signal “mhmh” and its various functions within the talk. Most prominently, the therapist uses this token to reinforce the patient as long as she follows his idea of how she might get better. This small insertion therefore functions as a conversational marker of handling a therapeutic theory. Conversation analysts think of talk as a subject not pre-determined by theoretical believes of the participants. This changes in the analysis of therapeutic talk, which is pre-structured, at least by the professional theories of the therapist. For a proper analysis of the conversation two systems should be taken into account. On the one hand Harvey Sacks’ idea of ‘Order at all points’ and on the other hand the methodological idea of ‘Theory at all points’. This combination leads to a description of conversational reality while taking theories into account.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander, J. C. (1982). Theoretical llogic in Sssociology, Vol. I: Positivism, Presuppositions, and current controversies. Berkely and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press, Routledge. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.

Ameka, F. (1992a). Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 101-118.

Ameka, F. (1992b). The meaning of phatic and conative interjections. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 245-271.

Aragno, A. (2008). The Language of empathy: an Analysis of its constitution, development, and role in psychoanalytic listening. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 56(3), 713-740.

Bakhtin, M. M. (2010). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Berking, M., & Rief, W. (2012). Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie für Bachelor: Band 1 Grundlagen und Störungswissen. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Blumer, H. G. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19 (1), 3-10.

Craighead, W. E., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2004). The concise corsini encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science. New Jersey, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Depressionshilfe, S. D. (2016, 09.08.2016, 00:03 Uhr). Verhaltenstherapie. Retrieved from http://www.deutsche-depressionshilfe.de/stiftung/psychotherapie.php

Dilling, H., Mombour, W., & Schmidt, M. H. (2008). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10 Kapitel V (F), Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien (6 ed.). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

Ehlich, K. (1979). Formen und Funktionen von 'HM'. Eine phonologisch-pragmatische Analyse. In H. Weydt (Ed.), Die Partikeln der deutschen Sprache (pp. 503-517). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Freud, S. (1910a). Five lectures on psycho-analysis (Vol. 11). London, UK: Hogarth Press.

Freud, S. (1926e). The question of lay analysis (Vol. 20). London, UK: Hogarth Press.

Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language, 787-815.

Greenson, R. (1966). Das Arbeitsbündnis und die Übertragungsneurose. Psyche, 2, 81-103.

Grencavage, L. M., & Norcross, J. C. (1990). Where Aare the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21(5), 372-378.

Harden, T. (1989). Na ja - ein vielseitiger Kommentar und seine portugiesischen Entsprechungen. In H. Weydt (Ed.), Sprechen mit Partikeln (pp. 141-149). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Hautzinger, M. (2008). Depressionen. In M. Linden & M. Hautzinger (Eds.), Verhaltenstherapiemanual. Heidelberg: Springer.

Hautzinger, M. (2009). Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie bei affektiven Störungen. Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie up2date, 3(01), 9-20.

Hoyer, J., Jacobi, F., & Leibing, E. (2006). Gesprächsführung in der Verhaltenstherapie. In E. Leibing, W. Hiller, & S. K. D. Sulz (Eds.), Verhaltenstherapie (Vol. 3, pp. 85-102). München: CIP-Medien.

Leudar, I., & Costall, A. (2009a). Against theory of mind. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Leudar, I., & Costall, A. (2009b). On the historical antecedents of the theory of mind Paradigm. In I. Leudar & A. Costall (Eds.), Against theory of mind. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Norrick, N. R. (2009). Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 866-891.

O'Keefe, A., & Adolphs, S. (2008). Response tokens in British and Irish discourse: Corpus, context and variational pragmatics. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages (pp. 69-98). Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 164-201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Risch, A. K., Stangier, U., Heidenreich, T., & Hautzinger, M. (2012). Kognitive Erhaltungstherapie bei rezidivierender Depression. Berlin: Springer.

Rodero, E. (2011). Intonation and emotion: influence of pitch levels and contour type on creating emotions. Journal of Voice, 25(1), e25-e34.

Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1). Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing.

Schachter, P., & Shopen, T. (1985). Parts-of-speech systems. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Clause structure (pp. 3-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71-93). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Streeck, U. (2006). Zur therapeutischen Beziehung in der Psychotherapie. In F. Leichsenring (Ed.), Psychoanalytische und tiefenpsychologisch fundierte Therapie (Vol. 2, pp. 33-48). München: CIP-Medien.

Tronick, E. (2005). Why is connection with others so critical? The formation of dyadic states of consciousness and the expansion of individuals' states of consciousness: coherence governed selection and the co-creation of meaning out of messy meaning making. In J. Nadel & D. Muir (Eds.), Emotional development: Recent research advances (pp. 293-315). Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7565/landp.v5i2.1559

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2049-324X